LIFE

Home | Contact Info | How To Receive Jesus | Believers Daily Declaration

The Real Motive Behind Abortion

Complicit Population Control


Posted: Jan, 2010
By Anthony Coleman

Most Americans are not aware of the history behind the billion dollar a year abortion industry.  Today money is obviously its primary goal, but historically speaking population control motivated the founders. 

If you bought into Eugenics (a) as founded by the half cousin of Darwin, Francis Galton, you would think that human ingenuity should be used to weed out certain elements of society in order to produce and elevate what is deemed the best.  Of course whoever has power automatically becomes the, "best." 

Many world dictators such as Hitler bought into Eugenics.  You could say at its core Eugenics is an inordinate love of self or ones ethnic group.  Often used to refer to this ideology is the term, "survival of the fittest."  The idea is to encourage the fit to reproduce while using subtle tactics to convince the unfit not to.  They sought to contain the "inferior" races through segregation, sterilization, birth control and abortion.

In an interview with the New York Times referring to the landmark abortion case Roe v. Wade, Ruth Bader Ginsburg made this statement:

"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."

- Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, New York Times

Let me translate that for you; Roe v. Wade was not primarily about ridding society of the disabled or to curb global population (a myth), but a concern about too many black people.  What a stunning admission! 

In America, most all abortions are performed by The American Birth Control League (ABCL) an organization founded in 1922 (illegally opened in 1916) by a devout Eugenicist named Margaret Sanger.  The organization went through a number of name changes before it finally settled on its most deceptive name in 1942 as Planned Parenthood.  Make no mistake about it, this woman repeatedly made it clear that her objectives included limiting if not exterminating the black population. 

Some have attempted to defend Sanger saying she was not racist yet her actions as an elitist and scientist are one in the same.  For instance; according to Sophia Smith Collection(Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts (b)); Sanger wrote in a letter dated December 19, 1939 to Dr. Clarence Gamble (c), suggesting the following:

"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities.  The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal.  We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. And the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."

History does demonstrate this.  White elitists have always seemed to find self-serving educated black religious leaders who blindly partner with them.  While we're on this; where do you think over 80% of Abortion clinics are located?  They are in black neighborhoods supported by black leaders.  In the 80's Planned Parenthood began to partner with the public school system; where did 100% of their clinics open?  Yes, in black neighborhoods with cooperation of black leaders.  Blacks are 20% percent of live births in the US yet the account for 36% of all abortions.  Talk about black-on-black injustice.

Sanger's Negro Project of 1939 charmed the black community's most distinguished leaders into accepting her plan, which was designed to their own detriment.  She peddled her program wrapped in pretty packages labeled "better health" and "family planning."

Here are some black members of the Birth Control Federation Of America's (BCFA) National Advisory Council (a previous name for Planned Parenthood) who helped paved the way for Planned Parenthood:

  • Claude A. Barnett, director, Associated Negro Press, Chicago
  • Michael J. Bent, M.D., Meharry Medical School, Nashville
  • Dr. Mary McLeod Bethune, president, National Council of Negro Women, Washington, D.C., special advisor to President Roosevelt on minority groups, and founder of Bethune-Cookman College, Daytona Beach
  • Dr. Dorothy Boulding Ferebee, cum laude graduate of Tufts, president of Alpha Kappa Alpha (the nation's oldest black sorority)k, Washington, D.C.
  • Charles S. Johnson, president, Fisk University, Nashville
  • Eugene Kinckle Jones, executive secretary, National Urban League, New York
  • Rev. Adam Clayton Powell Jr., pastor, Abyssinian Baptist Church, New York
  • Bishop David H. Sims, pastor, African Methodist Episcopal Church, Philadelphia
  • Arthur Spingarn, president, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People

Think about this for a moment.  From a political sense, what political party is the most adamant supporter of abortion?  What political party protects Roe v. Wade as their holy grail?  What party gets 90% of the black vote?  Has racism in part become collaboration?  I think it's part collaboration and a lot of ignorance.

Sanger's objective of population control has certainly succeeded.  Unless the slave trade is considered nothing has come close to killing more blacks in America than abortion.  At the rate of 1,452 a day blacks are experiencing genocide by our own hand. 

Dr. Johnny Hunter, National Director of the Life Education And Resource Network (LEARN), states "Sangers influence and the whole mindset that Planned Parenthood has brought into the black community says it's okay to destroy your people."

Some blacks have even made abortion "right" synonymous with civil rights.  Let's take a look at additional statements by Sanger.

The Review printed an excerpt of an address Sanger gave in 1926. In it she said:

"It now remains for the U.S. government to set a sensible example to the world by offering a bonus or yearly pension to all obviously unfit parents who allow themselves to be sterilized by harmless and scientific means. In this way the moron and the diseased would have no posterity to inherit their unhappy condition. The number of the feeble-minded would decrease and a heavy burden would be lifted from the shoulders of the fit."

In another writing, she decries the burden of "human waste" on society:

"It [charity] encourages the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant."

"There is no way to escape the implications," argues William L. Davis, a black financial analyst. "When an organization has a history of racism, when its literature is openly racist, when it goals are self-consciously racial, and when its programs invariably revolve around race, it doesn't take an expert to realize that the organization is indeed racist."

Notes:

a. Greek meaning  - well-born, or good offspring

b.  Also described in Linda Gordon's Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.

c.  255 Adams Street, Milton Massachusetts (of the soap-manufacturing company Procter and Gamble, the BCFA regional director of the South)

Questions A Young Woman Might Ask Herself
Before having an abortion

Posted: Nov, 2009
By Anthony Coleman
                                                                                                     
The right and ownership of their body is a big argument used by young women who want abortion on demand.  Questions should be asked of her regarding this thought; at what point does a child begin to have rights?  Is it at conception?  Is it at nine months?  Is it at 2 years old? 
                                                                      
The bible clearly identifies the individual while he or she is still in the womb.
                                                                 
Psalms 22:9                
But You [are] He who took me(not it) out of the womb; You made me trust [while] on my mother's breasts. 
                                                                               
Jeremiah 1:5              
Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I dedicated you, 
                                                                   
Also, what does it say about divine trust in would be mothers who are willing to abandon responsibility to protect the innocent unborn?
                                                                 
Prov. 24:11-12            
Rescue those who are being dragged to death, and from those tottering to execution withdraw not. 
                                                                                 

If a child is an inconvenience and the mother by ownership of her body can end the life in the womb, by what reasoning would we then prevent her from ending the life two months later outside the womb.  Wouldn’t it be accurate to say that the inconvenience increases once the child is outside the womb?  How many of us dismiss the consequence of this kind of thinking?

Another thing that a young woman might ask herself; is the brutality and emotional trauma of an abortion procedure together with the intentional elimination of innocent human life simply out of convenience, the right response to your situation? 
                                                                                         
Are other alternatives simply out of the question?  Could it be worse to allow life opportunity with loving adoptive parents than to kill it?
                                                               
Finally; are you prepared to live the rest of your life bearing the consequence of voluntarily taking innocent life when it could have been prevented?
                                                                                        
When the history of this republic is finalized, the stain of slavery won’t be our greatest sin, the convenience of abortion will be.  Think about it.
                                                                                   

Changing Leaders A Matter Of Life Or Death

One supports life another dismisses it

Posted:  Nov 2009
By Anthony Coleman
 
                                                                   
Most conservative politicians campaign as strong advocates of life.  They promise that once elected they will work towards eliminating abortion on demand as well tax payer funded services.  With every promise, most candidates do not make good on them once they are elected.  George W. Bush was a rare exception.  Once in office and when it came to reducing abortions he used the executive seat more often than any President since Roe v. Wad was passed. 
                                                                   
The cycle of party politics using life issues such as abortion as a means of polarizing Americans against one another has always been pernicious.  For instance, under President Reagan, in 1984 the Mexico City Policy was introduced which prohibited non-governmental organizations receiving federal funds from providing or promoting abortions in other nations.  This was a mechanism that the executive branch could use to reduce abortions without getting into battles with congress. 
                                                                           
President Bill Clinton rescinded the rule January 22, 1993.  He didn’t seem to mind using tax payer money to promote and or provide abortions.  He called the policy “excessively broad” and unwarranted. 
                                                                                            
Once George W Bush was in office in Jan 2001, he immediately reinstated the policy explaining that “taxpayer funds should not be used to pay for abortion or actively promote abortion."  
                                                                                           
Immediately after taking office Barack Obama made it a priority to see to it that once again Americans fund and promote abortions around the world.  What does it say about the politics of one party when abortion becomes its identity?   
                                                                                                                     
It’s been pointed out by leaders that during his campaign Obama stated that he wanted to reduce the number of abortions.  It makes absolutely no sense to begin your administration by taking action that guarantees the number of abortions will increase.        
                                                                                              
But, as so many politicians do, Obama campaigned on both sides of the abortion issue.  Though saying in one setting that he would work to reduce abortions he also said in other settings that the first thing he would do as President is “sign the Freedom of Choice Act.”  This bill is one of the most aggressive pro-abortion measures which would purge the nation of most anti-abortion regulations.  That was at the forefront of Obama’s mind.  Explain that to me? 
                                                                                        
What laws would be overturned if the Freedom of Choice Act ever becomes laws?
                                                                                              
·         Partial Birth Abortion Act 2003
·         The Hyde Amendment (restricting taxpayer funded abortions in US)
·         Informed consent laws
·         Waiting period laws
·         Parental consent & Notification laws
·         Abortion clinics following health laws
·         Ban on non-physicians doing abortions
·         Ban on abortions of babies survived outside the womb 
                                                                                                           
Changing leaders can be extremely deadly.  With the stroke of a pen resources are taken out of the hands of organizations that encourage responsible ways to handle issues of life and given to organizations that run death mills.   
                                                                                                                      
Changing leaders is truly a matter of life or death.

Enter supporting content here